Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus(XYLOPY)
EPPO Datasheet: Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus
IDENTITY
Authority: Bates
Taxonomic position: Animalia: Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Insecta: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae
Other scientific names: Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus f. hattorii Ohbayashi, Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus pyrrhoderus Bates
Common names in English: grape borer, grape borer beetle, grape tiger longicorn
view more common names online...
Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature
Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus includes two subspecies: X. pyrrhoderus pyrrhoderus and X. pyrrhoderus nigrosternus, which differ in the colour of the prosternum and mesosternum (Gressitt, 1951; Niisato & Adachi, 2005).
view more categorizations online...
EPPO Code: XYLOPY
HOSTS 2026-09-04
Confirmed hosts of X. pyrrhoderus belong to the family Vitaceae (EPPO, 2025) and include Ampelopsis glandulosa var. brevipedunculata, Vitis ficifolia and V. vinifera. In addition, X. pyrrhoderus has been recorded in Japan on many Vitis interspecific crossings (Tsuchiya, 1988). These crossings involve Vitis species native to East Asia, such as V. amurensis, or not native to East Asia, such as V. vinifera or various North American species (V. labrusca, V. aestivalis, V. lincecumii, V. riparia, V. berlandieri and V. rupestris) and hybrids. In the literature, there are records on another Vitaceae, Parthenocissus tricuspidata, as well as on Celastrus orbiculatus (Celastraceae), but these hosts are uncertain (EPPO, 2025).
Host list: Ampelopsis glandulosa var. brevipedunculata, Vitis ficifolia, Vitis hybrids, Vitis viniferaGEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION 2026-09-04
Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus is native to East Asia. It has been introduced in the United States, where it was found for the first time in 2020 in Hampden County, Massachusetts (CAPS, 2023).
North America: United States of America (Massachusetts)
BIOLOGY 2026-09-04
Throughout its native range, the life cycle of X. pyrrhoderus from egg to adult lasts about 1 year, from the summer or beginning of autumn in the first year to the same period in the following year (Ashihara, 1982a, 1982b; Kim et al., 1988; Miyazaki et al., 1977). There is no evidence that X. pyrrhoderus can develop a generation over several years.
DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION 2026-09-04
Symptoms
The bark of shoots and canes on which larvae feed presents blackened and slightly swollen areas, which can be observed from the overwintering period of larvae onwards (Tsuchiya, 1988; Yamada, 1974). When larvae resume feeding actively in late spring, signs of the presence of X. pyrrhoderus are wilting and die-back of shoots and canes, and dark sap oozing from surviving vines. The round exit holes of adults may be observed later in the year (Yamada, 1974).
Morphology
Eggs are milky white, oblong and measure about 1 mm in length (Miyazaki et al., 1977; Tsuchiya, 1988; Yamada, 1974).
Larvae are pale yellow with a brown head (Tsuchiya, 1988) and have a shape typical of Cerambycidae larvae (wide prothorax and tapering toward the end of the abdomen). Newly hatched larvae measure about 1 mm in length and mature larvae 12–21 mm in length (Tsuchiya, 1988; Zhang et al., 2025).
Pupae are light yellowish brown, with a large spherical pronotum. They measure about 8–20 mm in length (Kim et al., 1988; Tsuchiya, 1988; Zhang et al., 2025).
Adults are 6–15 mm long (Han & Lyu, 2010; Kim et al., 1988; Tsuchiya, 1988; Zhang et al., 2025). They have a black head and a red pronotum, as long as wide, with dense and coarse punctures. The scutellum is red with distal yellowish pubescence. Elytra are black with thick yellowish bands on basal and sub-apical areas, a basal yellowish band connected by a sharp angle with the sub-basal band along the elytral suture, and a sub-apical area with a transverse whitish pubescence band. Elytra are about 2.1 times as long as wide, apex of elytra truncated with outward spine-like projection (Han & Lyu, 2010). The subspecies nigrosternus has a black prosternum and mesosternum (Gressitt, 1951; Niisato & Adachi, 2005).
Larvae, pupae and adults may be confused with those of other Cerambycidae. For example, in the EPPO region, the larvae of a number of Phymatodes species are associated with Vitis. Adults of X. pyrrhoderus have similar colours (red thorax, black elytra with yellowish bands) to those of X. rufilius, and some vague resemblance with other cerambycid species that have Vitis in their host range (EPPO, 2025).
Detection and inspection methods
Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus can be detected by inspecting plants for signs of infestation (see the Section 5.1). Larvae do not eject frass from their galleries, which makes detection difficult at early stages of infestation (Clausen, 1931, citing Matsumoto & Watanabe, 1920; KRRDA, 2024).
Adults can be identified by morphological methods (Bates, 1873; Gressitt, 1951; Han & Lyu, 2010; Lin et al., 2021). EPPO (2025) specifies the characters to distinguish X. pyrrhoderus from the similar X. rufilius. At the time of the preparation of the EPPO PRA, no complete description of pupae, larvae and eggs of X. pyrrhoderus was found, and there was no reliable COI barcode that would allow molecular identification (EPPO, 2025).
Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus has a male sex pheromone, whose components have been synthetized (Iwabuchi, 1982; Iwabuchi et al., 1986; Sakai et al., 1984). Trapping systems have been partially investigated (Iwabuchi, 1982; Iwabuchi et al., 1986; Narai et al., 2015). At the time of the preparation of the EPPO PRA, no information was found on whether the male sex pheromone is available commercially, nor on the response of X. pyrrhoderus to ethanol or other possible attractants (EPPO, 2025).
PATHWAYS FOR MOVEMENT 2026-09-04
Host plants for planting (except seeds, pollen and tissue cultures) are the only potential pathway identified for X. pyrrhoderus (EPPO, 2025). X. pyrrhoderus may be associated with plants with roots that carry canes (e.g. ornamental hosts, including grapevine and bonsais), and with cuttings if those carry buds and are woody (EPPO, 2025). Many EPPO countries prohibit the import of Vitis plants for planting. For those where import is allowed, the EPPO PRA assessed the likelihood of entry on Vitis plants for planting as low with moderate uncertainty. The likelihood of entry on plants for planting of Ampelopsis glandulosa var. brevipedunculata is similar. Host plants for planting may be traded for ornamental purposes or for propagation, or be carried by travellers (EPPO, 2025).
All life stages may be associated with host plants for planting. The main limiting factors for successful entry of X. pyrrhoderus are the fact that material exported by the nursery trade and for propagation is expected to be subject to some degree of scrutiny, and that successful transfer to a host plant involves several steps: the life stages in the commodity have to complete their development, the infested plants should not be detected and removed, a male and a female should emerge in the same time frame and mate, and the female should find a host plant (EPPO, 2025).
Entry on other commodities, including items made of grapevine canes such as wreaths, was considered very unlikely (EPPO, 2025).
PEST SIGNIFICANCE 2026-09-04
Economic impact
Damage is due to larval feeding on the cambium and xylem. Most damage occurs on shoots and canes (i.e. <2 years old), but damage can also occur on 2- to 4-year-old wood. Feeding by larvae may cause buds to fail to sprout (Miyazaki etal.,1977). New shoots sprouting between the infested area and the tip of the cane may wilt and die within 2–3 days (Hirai & Tsukio,2022; Yamada, 1974). Breakage of canes on young vines has a major influence on pruning and on the future shape of the plant (Shimane Prefecture, 2024). On 2- to 3-year-old wood, damage can weaken the vine and inhibit the growth of new shoots (Miyazaki et al., 1977), and breakage may also happen (Hirai & Tsukio, 2022; Shimane Prefecture, 2024; KRRDA, 2024). On 3- or 4-year-old woody parts or branches, larval feeding causes weakening and, even if the branch survives, the growth of new shoots can be severely stunted (Yamada 1974). In Yamanashi prefecture, although damage mostly occurred from planting to young vines of about 4 years old, the pest was also found in older vineyards (Tsuchiya,1988). The state of the vines, pruning method and variety influence damage (Miyazaki et al., 1977; Tsuchiya, 1988; Wang, 2017; Yamada, 1974).
In Japan, X. pyrrhoderus was already considered a pest of grapevine in the early 20th century (Clausen, 1931). The literature of the 1970s–1980s details impact and work on control methods (e.g. Yamada, 1974; Miyazaki et al., 1977; Ashihara, 1982a, 1982b; Tsuchiya, 1988). In some production areas, it was not uncommon that young vineyards were abandoned before the grapevines matured (Tsuchiya, 1988). There is historical evidence from Japan that when a management measure was removed, damage increased (Matsumoto & Fujiwara, 1978). In the Republic of Korea, X. pyrrhoderus has been occurring frequently and damaging grapevine since the beginning of the 1980s (KRRDA, 2024). In China, in some vineyards, between 20 and 90% of grape plants were infested by the pest, depending on management level and plant age (Wang, 2017, citing Huang & Yang 2002).
No evidence was found of current major economic impact by this pest when developing the EPPO PRA, but recent references from the Republic of Korea and Japan indicate that pest management measures are applied (e.g. Hirai & Tsukio, 2022; Shimane Prefecture, 2024, KRRDA, 2024). In these countries, table grapes are a valuable product, and this is possibly why the pest is subject to management and the reported impact is currently low (EPPO, 2025). No damage has been reported in Massachusetts to date (2025–12).
Control
In Asia, X. pyrrhoderus is controlled by cultural and chemical control methods (Wang, 2017). The main cultural method consists of removing damaged and infested material during pruning, and destroying pruned material (KRRDA, 2024; Wang, 2017, citing others; Liu, 2014; Hirai & Tsukio, 2022). In addition, destruction of ‘neglected’ grapevine plants in the vicinity of vineyards has been recommended (Yamada, 1974). Removing larvae during winter pruning has also been used (Clausen, 1931, citing Matsumoto & Watanabe, 1920; Liu, 2014; Noukan, 2024), but it is labour-intensive and damaging to the plants (Yamada, 1974). Insecticide treatments are recommended by spraying in summer/autumn against adults, eggs and early larval instars (Wang, 2017, citing others; Noukan, 2024. Liu, 2014; Hirai & Tsukio, 2022).
Phytosanitary risk
Hosts of X. pyrrhoderus are widely cultivated in the EPPO region for fruit production or as ornamentals, and they are also present in nature. X. pyrrhoderus may establish outdoors in a wide part of the EPPO region, covering some parts of all EPPO countries except Ireland and the United Kingdom. The northern limit of potential establishment is uncertain, that is, whether the climate is suitable and there is sufficient presence of cultivated hosts in the northern part of the region. X. pyrrhoderus is expected to spread via a combination of natural spread and human-assisted pathways (EPPO, 2025).
Commercial grapevine production has a high economic value in the EPPO region. Damage is likely to be more important on newly planted and young vineyards, because the pest may damage the structural part of the vines. However, vineyards in full production may also be exposed to yield losses due to attacks on fruiting canes, though plants are expected to recover. Control strategies would need to be developed, which would take time following an introduction. X. pyrrhoderus would lead to permanent added cost to production, especially in major grapevine growing areas in favourable climatic conditions. Organic viticulture, which is important in part of the EPPO region, may be more strongly affected. Impacts are expected to vary within the EPPO region, with more impact in areas where climatic conditions are more favourable to the pest. In addition, some common viticultural practices may not be possible anymore where X. pyrrhoderus needs to be controlled, such as leaving pruning material as mulch on the field, or mechanized pruning. Finally, X. pyrrhoderus may have impact on Vitis vinifera subsp. silvestris, which is present in nature and is considered endangered in several EPPO countries, and it may also incur a need for measures on hosts which are generally not managed, such as ornamental plants (EPPO, 2025).PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES 2026-09-04
Phytosanitary measures are recommended for plants for planting (except seeds, pollen, tissue cultures) of Vitis spp. and Ampelopsis glandulosa var. brevipedunculata (EPPO, 2025). The following options were identified: pest-free area; pest-free production site or pest-free place of production established under physical isolation according to EPPO Standard PM 5/8 (EPPO, 2016) associated with storage in conditions preventing infestation; importing plants for planting which have not developed lignified parts yet; or post-entry quarantine for one full cycle of vegetation (in the framework of a bilateral agreement).
REFERENCES 2026-09-04
Ashihara W (1982a) Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on the Development of the Grape Borer, Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 26, 15-22. (in Japanese)
Ashihara W (1982b) Seasonal life history of the grape tiger borer Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus. Bulletin of the Fruit Tree Research Station Series E4, 91-112. (in Japanese)
Bates HW (1873) XXV. On the longicorn coleoptera of Japan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12(69), 193-201.
CAPS (2023) Pest Detection/CAPS Infrastructure Accomplishment Report – FY2022. AP22PPQFO000C263. 05/01/2022 – 04/30/2023. Project Document Date 05/15/2023. Available at https://portal.ct.gov/ [accessed 16 December 2025]
Clausen CP (1931) Insects Injurious to Agriculture in Japan. United States Department of Agriculture Circular No. 168. Washington DC, USA. 115 pp.
EPPO (2016) Standard PM5/8(1) Guidelines on the phytosanitary measure ‘Plants grown under physical isolation’. https://gd.eppo.int/standards/PM5/ [accessed on 16 December 2025]
EPPO (2025) EPPO Technical Document No. 1098. Pest risk analysis for Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus. EPPO, Paris. Available at https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/XYLOPY/documents [accessed on 16 December 2025]
Gressitt JL (1951) Longicorn beetles of China. Longicornia, Vol.2. 667 pp.
Han Y, Lyu D (2010) Taxonomic Review of the Genus Xylotrechus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae) in Korea with a Newly Recorded Species. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 49(2), 69-82.
Hirai K, Tsukio Y (eds) (2022) [Pest control handbook. Grape pests and diseases]. Published by the National Rural Education Association. (in Japanese)
Iwabuchi K (1982) Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). I. Behavioral sequences and existence of the male sex pheromone. Applied Entomology and Zoology 17, 494-500.
Iwabuchi K, Takahashi J, Nakagawa Y, Sakai T (1986) Behavioral Responses of Female Grape Borer Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to Synthetic Male Sex Pheromone Components. Applied Entomology and Zoology 21, 21-27.
Kim KC, Lee JH, Park JD, Shin HW (1988) [Studies on the bionomics and damage aspect of the grape tiger longicorn (Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates)]. Rural Development Review 23, 77-84. (in Korean)
KRRDA (2024) [Datasheet]. Korea Republic Rural Development Administration https://www.nongsaro.go.kr/portal/ps/pss/pssa/hlsctSearchDtl.ps?pageIndex=1&pageSize=10&&hlsctCode=H00000369&menuId=PS00202 [in Korean] [accessed on 16 December 2025]
Lin M, Ge S, Xiao N (2021) A study of the genus Xylotrechus Chevrolat (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from Beijing, China. Entomotaxonomia 43(3), 1-20.
Liu S (ed.) (2014) [Diagnosis and control of grape pests and diseases]. Machine Industry Press. 138 pp. (in Chinese)
Matsumoto K, Fujiwara A (1978) [Effects of Addition of Spreader on the Chemical Control of the Grape Borer]. Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 22(1), 38-39. (in Japanese)
Miyazaki M, Kitamura K, Ishii T (1977) [Biology and control of the grape tiger beetle]. Plant Protection 31, 21-25. (in Japanese)
Narai Y, Zou Y, Nakamuta K, Mongold-Diers JA, Hanks LM, Millar JG (2015) Candidate Attractant Pheromones of Two Potentially Invasive Asian Cerambycid Species in the Genus Xylotrechus. Journal of Economic Entomology 108(3),1444-1446.
Niisato T, Adachi K (2005) [Grape longhorn beetle on Tsushima]. Coleopterists’ News 149(3), 18. (in Japanese)
Noukan (2024) Nr 267 Grape tiger beetle. (in Japanese). http://noukan.web.fc2.com/noukan/23/23624.html [accessed on 16 December 2025]
Sakai T, Nakagawa Y, Takahashi J, Iwabuchi K, Ishii K (1984) Isolation and Identification of the Male Sex Pheromone of the Grape Borer Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Chemistry Letters 13(2), 263-264. (abstract)
Shimane Prefecture (2024) Grape longhorn beetle. (in Japanese). https://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/industry/norin/gijutsu/nougyo_tech/byougaityuu/byougaityuu-index/budou/gr139.html [accessed on 16 December 2025]
Tsuchiya T (1988) [Studies on bionomics and control measures of the grape borer (Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates)]. Bulletin of the Yamanachi Fruit Tree Experiment Station 63(8). 92 pp. (in Japanese)
Wang Q (2017) 12. Cerambycid Pests in Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. In Cerambycidae of the World: Biology and Pest Management (ed Wang Q), pp. 409-562. CRC Press.
Yamada K (1974) [Biology and control of the grape tiger beetle]. Plant protection 28, 23-26 (441-444). (in Japanese)
Zhang G, Jia Y, Wu H, Zhang Y, Ghanim M, Ma Y, Sun R (2025) Developmental Biology and Seasonal Damage of the Grape Borer Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus in Grapevines. Insects 16, 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16090979
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2026-09-04
This datasheet was prepared in 2025 by the EPPO Secretariat based on the pest risk analysis produced by an EPPO expert working group in 2024. The expert working group was composed of C. Gent (DEFRA, GB), D. Kasatkin (VNIIKR, RU), G. Lukácsy (Hungarian University of Agronomy and Life Sciences, HU), R. Mouttet (ANSES, FR), R. Potting (NVWA, NL), J. Tuomola (Ruokavirasto, FI).
How to cite this datasheet?
Datasheet history 2026-09-04
EPPO (2026) Datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus. EPPO Bulletin 56(2), 239-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.70070
