EPPO Global Database

Triadica sebifera(SAQSE)

EPPO Datasheet: Triadica sebifera

Last updated: 2020-04-23


Preferred name: Triadica sebifera
Authority: (Linnaeus) Small
Taxonomic position: Plantae: Magnoliophyta: Angiospermae: Fabids: Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae: Euphorbioideae
Other scientific names: Carumbium sebiferum (Linnaeus) Kurz, Croton sebiferum Linnaeus, Excoecaria sebifera (Linnaeus) Müller von Aargau, Sapium sebiferum (Linnaeus) Roxburgh, Seborium chinense Rafinesque, Stillingia sebifera (Linnaeus) Michaux, Stillingia sinensis Baillon
Common names in English: Chinese tallow tree, vegetable tallow
view more common names online...
EPPO Categorization: A1 list
EU Categorization: IAS of Union concern
view more categorizations online...


History of introduction and spread

Triadica sebifera is native to China and Japan with a non-native distribution showing invasive behaviour in the USA and Australia. In the southern USA, T. sebifera is a major invasive species. Although it was first introduced in the late 18th century, it did not become invasive until the 20th century. This invasion pattern may be due to greater propagule pressure brought about by large-scale commercial planting and hurricanes. Invasions convert grasslands to woody thickets, displace native species and disrupt ecological processes. DeWalt et al. (2011) stated that ‘Present populations near the sites of the earliest introductions of Chinese tallow tree to the southeastern USA (Charleston, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia) appear to differ in genetic composition as well as genetic diversity from populations resulting from introductions made approximately 120 years later to the rest of the southeastern USA.’ 

T. sebifera is becoming an invasive environmental weed of water courses and native vegetation areas in Australia (NSW Government, Australia, 2017). It was originally introduced to as an ornamental tree and has been planted in streets and garden in southeast Queensland and Northern New South Wales (NSW). Naturalised populations occur in various locations throughout south-east Queensland. The largest infestation exists near Casino, NSW. Smaller infestations are evident throughout the North Coast, Central Coast and New England regions of NSW and localized plants exist in Victoria (NSW Government, Australia, 2017). DeWalt et al. (2011) details that it is unknown when T. sebifera was introduced to Australia, however, its genetic similarity to the rest of the South-eastern USA indicates that it may have been introduced in the early 1900s at the same time it was being extensively planted in areas along the USA coast of the Gulf of Mexico or that it represents a secondary invasion from the South-eastern USA. 

In the EPPO region, the species is absent from the natural environment but there has been historic planting of the species in gardens and botanical gardens.


Africa: South Africa, Sudan, Uganda, Zambia
Asia: China (Anhui, Fujian, Gansu, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hubei, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Shandong, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang), India, Japan, Korea, Republic, Pakistan, Taiwan
North America: Mexico, United States of America (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia)
Central America and Caribbean: Cuba, Martinique
South America: Brazil, Peru
Oceania: Australia (New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria), New Zealand

MORPHOLOGY 2020-06-09

Plant type 

Deciduous medium-sized tree. 


A deciduous tree 20 to 30 m tall. Low-spreading and multiforked to tall and columnar. Stem often crooked and gnarled. Bark is grey, brown and rough. Exudes a milky sap. Twigs slender. Petioles 2–6 cm long, with two sessile disc-shaped glands at the apex. Leaf blades broadly rhombic-ovate, 2–7.5 x 1.5–7 cm, abruptly acutely acuminate, broadly cuneate to rounded, subtruncate at the base, entire, lateral nerves 7–12 pairs, glaucous beneath. Stipules 1-2 mm long, obtuse. T. sebifera flowers from April to June, producing both male and female flowers. Fruits are 1 cm three-lobed capsules expected to mature in the autumn. Seeds are 8 mm long and chalky white (covered by a white wax) (Scheld & Cowles, 1981; Bruce et al., 1997).



Often, more than 95% of seeds are viable, but viability drops to between 10% and 50% after 1 year in natural settings (Renne et al., 2002). A mature tree can produce an average of 100 000 seeds annually, depending on environmental conditions (Jubinsky & Anderson, 1996; Bruce et al., 1997; USDA, 2000). According to Scheld & Cowles (1981), T. sebifera can grow up to a height of 2.8 m within 2 years of germination. In addition to intentional plantings by humans, birds and waterways disperse T. sebifera seeds (Jubinsky & Anderson, 1996; Bruce et al., 1997). 


In North America, T. sebifera has a wide environmental tolerance and can thrive in many different habitats, including forests, wetlands, grasslands, coastal prairie, mesic sites, disturbed sites, low-lying fields, swamp and scrubby flatlands (Bruce et al., 1997; Langeland & Enloe, 2009; Camarillo et al., 2015). T. sebifera is capable of invading closed and open forest systems. In the native range in China, T. sebifera is found in disturbed habitats at low densities.

Environmental requirements

In the southern forests of the USA, approximately 80% of tallow invasions occur at elevations lower than 50 m or slopes of <2°. At higher elevations, and with steeper slopes, the likelihood of invasion drops dramatically and ‘no invasion was reported in the FIA [Forest Inventory Analysis] data for sites where elevation was >165 m or slopes were steeper than 18°’ (Gan et al., 2009). In Taiwan, T. sebifera plantations occur at elevations of 400–700 m (Lin et al., 1958). Surveys of T. sebifera in the Indian Himalayas recorded trees at an elevational limit of 1600 m (Jaryan et al., 2013). 

In the southern forests of the USA, T. sebifera did not occur at survey sites where the mean minimum temperature in January was below -12°C (10°F) (Gan et al., 2009). Grace (1998) suggested that the likeliest northern boundary of T. sebifera should be where average minimum winter temperatures dip to -12 to -15°C. In a climate modelling study using CLIMEX, temperatures of 12 and 24°C were determined as the lower temperature threshold for growth and the lower limit of optimal temperature growth, respectively. The upper temperature limit for optimal growth and the upper temperature threshold for growth were determined to be 35 and 40°C, respectively. These values were reached after average annual temperature data from the native range of T. sebifera was consulted (Pattison & Mack, 2008).

In Taiwan, T. sebifera has been reported on sites with average annual precipitation ranging from 1070 to 3733 mm (Lin et al., 1958; Kirmse & Fisher, 1989; Siemann & Rogers, 2003; Meyer, 2011). In the USA and mainland China, T. sebifera sites had an average annual precipitation of 1000–2000 mm ( E Siemann, pers. comm. 2017). Kirmse & Fisher (1989) described a New Mexico (USA) plantation where T. sebifera grew well with average annual precipitation of 243 mm, although trees were irrigated for the first 2 months after transplanting (90.6% survival). 

Evidence from plantations and the native and naturalized range of T. sebifera indicates that it is compatible with a wide range of soil types: clays, loams and sands (Radford et al., 1968; Scheld & Cowles, 1981; Bruce et al., 1995).  In Taiwan, Lin et al. (1958) determined the chemical properties of soils on the ‘18 main habitats of T. sebifera tree’. Total nitrogen was 0–0.20% and pH was 2.9–8.5. Gan et al. (2009) found that in sites throughout the south-eastern USA the probability of invasion was greater closer to water bodies, probably due in part to soil moisture levels that were favourable for establishment. Bruce (1993) showed that T. sebifera exhibited significantly lower seedling survival in treatments with 23% soil moisture compared with treatments with ≥31% soil moisture (Bruce, 1993; Meyer, 2011). 

Jones & McLeod (1989) found a positive relationship between light availability and biomass production where the greatest production was achieved under 100% light. In greenhouse experiments, seedling shoot and total biomass were significantly lower in ambient light than under an 87% shade cloth. In the field, seedlings perform much better in open than in shaded habitats.

Natural enemies 

There are no known natural enemies in the EPPO region. 

Uses and benefits 

T. sebifera is a highly valued species for both its ornamental qualities and productive capability in agricultural and industrial sectors. Tallow wood is white and close-grained, suitable for carvings, furniture, carts and match making as well as incense (Lin et al., 1958; USDA, 2000). The leaves are used to make a black dye and manure (Lin et al., 1958; USDA, 2000).

T. sebifera tree seeds are a source of vegetable tallow, a quick-drying oil and protein food. The outer covering of the seeds contains solid fat known as Chinese vegetable tallow and the kernels produce a drying oil called stillingia oil. Candles, soap, cloth dressing and fuel are made from the tallow. The oil is used in machine oils, as a crude lamp oil and in making varnishes and paints (because of its quick-drying properties). The presscake remaining after extraction of tallow and oil can be processed to make a valuable animal feed and human food, rich in protein. Different parts of the plants are used in traditional Chinese medicine (USDA 2000, Gao et al., 2016). 

In the early 20th century, the Foreign Plant Introduction Division of the US Department of Agriculture promoted the planting of tallow trees in the Gulf Coast and Southern US States to establish a local soap industry (USDA, 2000; DeWalt et al., 2011). When cultivated under conventional agricultural methods, T. sebifera can be grown over extensive areas of land and can provide woody biomass for direct burning or conversion to charcoal, ethanol and methanol (Scheld & Cowles, 1981; USDA, 2000). Wen et al., (2010) demonstrated that T. sebifera seed oil can be converted to biodiesel. Due to its ability to resprout, its rapid growth rate and its tolerance to flooding, drought and salt, T. sebifera has been considered as a biomass crop for the Gulf Coast region of the USA (Scheld & Cowles, 1981; USDA, 2000). 

Birds, both wild and domestic, will feed on the seeds and it is sometime recommended as a bird food (USDA, 2000, Renne et al., 2002). The flowers of T. sebifera are visited by honeybees, contributing to a commercially desirable, light-coloured honey (USDA, 2000; Renne et al., 2002). T. sebifera is recognized as an important species for commercial honey production in Louisiana (Lieux, 1975). 

With regard to repeated introductions, T. sebifera has an extensive history of cultivation and sale and as an ornamental, especially in the USA (Bruce et al., 1997; Siemann & Rogers, 2003; Camarillo et al., 2015). By 1983, 200 000 - 300 000 trees were being grown for the ornamental trade in Houston, Texas alone (USDA, 2000). 

Within the EPPO region, apart from the species in trade, there are no current socio-economic benefits for the species. Currently, there is little information available on the value of the species in horticulture. The species is listed as available from two suppliers in the UK (https://www.rhs.org.uk/ Plants/Nurseries-Search-Result?query=239677).


T. sebifera has a long history of deliberate planting within the EPPO region. Seeds can be bought on the internet and shipped nearly anywhere in the EPPO region. T. sebifera is available via nurseries within the EPPO region. The species can also be purchased via online suppliers outside the EPPO region. However, given that the seeds can be dispersed by birds and waterways, any tree producing berries within the EPPO region could be the origin of a new establishment, especially trees that are planted near moving bodies of water. T. sebifera can survive in urban, rural, natural and disturbed habitat.

IMPACTS 2020-06-09

Effects on plants 

In the USA, T. sebifera displaces native plant species and establishes dominant stands, and can transform areas of prairie and grassland to woody thickets within 10 years (Cameron & Spencer, 1989; Bruce et al., 1995, 1997; Siemann & Rogers, 2003). T. sebifera has been shown to invade south-east coastal prairie that is the sole habitat of the federally endangered Attwater’s prairie chicken (Tympanuchus cupido attwateri), the exclusive wintering ground of the federally endangered whooping crane (Grus americana) and important habitat for several other critically imperilled grassland birds. In addition, one federally endangered and 12 critically imperilled (category 11) plant species occur in the remaining fragments of this once vast ecosystem. 

Environmental and social impact 

T. sebifera can decrease water quality. The species can also displace native species, reducing genetic resources. When leaf material becomes incorporated into the water body, this has been shown to be toxic to amphibians (Cotton et al., 2012). Leonard (2008) showed that the leaf litter can have negative impacts on the native habitat: (1) leaf litter has a direct effect on water quality; (2) T. sebifera can cause differential survival and performance of tadpoles; (3) differences in water quality due to leaf litter can cause changes in tadpole behaviour; and (4) T. sebifera leaf litter breaks down much faster than litter from native trees and this influences the composition of the aquatic community. 

T. sebifera supports a lower diversity of arthropods than co-occurring native trees in Texas (Hartley et al., 2010) and the native prairies it displaces (Cameron & Spencer, 1989; Hartley et al., 2004). T. sebifera seedlings can establish at such high densities that fine fuels are lacking even in a stand of smaller trees. These changes in fuel characteristics result in patchier and/or less severe fires, with a negative impact on native species (Meyer, 2011). 

T. sebifera exhibits rapid leaf decay, which may alter soil nutrients (primarily higher levels of nitrogen) in ecosystems with fewer deciduous trees. T. sebifera can alter nutrient cycling and the species composition of decomposers. T. sebifera stands in Texas demonstrated higher net productivity than the original grassland ecosystem, and at 15 years old, T. sebifera stands in Texas demonstrated significantly higher net primary productivity than adjacent native prairie (Harcombe et al., 1993). Cameron & Spencer (1989) found that in T. sebifera woodland the concentrations of the nutrients P, K, NO3–N, Zn, Mn and Fe were significantly higher than in native prairie, while Mg and Na were significantly lower. T. sebifera exhibits rapid leaf decay, which may increase nutrient alteration in ecosystems with fewer deciduous trees (Cameron & Spencer, 1989).

In invasive contexts, T. sebifera can alter nutrient cycling and species composition among decomposers (Cameron & Spencer, 1989; Zou et al., 2006). Siemann & Rogers (2003) demonstrated that the competitive advantage displayed by T. sebifera in the Southern USA may be due to the species being released from specialist herbivores. After comparing populations from the invasive range in Texas with populations from the native range in China, Rogers & Siemann (2005) concluded that ‘invasive Sapium ecotypes have a greater capacity to compensate for herbivory damage than native Sapium ecotypes’.

CONTROL 2019-10-08

Most sources describe T. sebifera infestations as nearly impossible to eliminate. Mechanical control of T. sebifera in Florida has either failed or exacerbated the infestation. Previous attempts at control have been through application of prescribed burns and mechanical removal of trees and seedlings, but there has been limited success due to the density of growth and the likelihood of disturbing non-target vegetation and soil. If the roots are not completely removed, the tree will regenerate. However, most sources agree that control should take place over a 3–5 year period. Proven, reliable, biological control agents are not currently available. In North America, applications of basal bark herbicide are commonly used for control.


In 2016, T. sebifera was identified as a priority for risk assessment within the requirements of Regulation 1143/2014 (Branquart et al., 2016; Tanner et al., 2017). A subsequent pest risk analysis concluded that T. sebifera posed a high phytosanitary risk to the endangered area (EPPO, 2018) and was added to the EPPO A1 List of pests recommended for regulation. In 2019, T. sebifera was included on the (EU) list of Union concern (EU Regulation 1143/2014). 

In the USA, T. sebifera is listed as a noxious weed in the following States: Florida, Mississippi, Texas and Louisiana (https://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=TRSE6).  In Australia, T. sebifera is regarded as an environmental weed in New South Wales and a potential environmental weed in Queensland.

REFERENCES 2019-10-08

Branquart E, Brundu G, Buholzer S, Chapman D, Ehret P, Fried G et al. (2016) A prioritization process for invasive alien plant species incorporating the requirements of the EU Regulation 1143/2014. EPPO Bulletin 47, 603–617. 

Bruce KA (1993) Factors affecting the biological invasion of the exotic Chinese tallow tree, Sapium sebiferum, in the Gulf coast prairie of Texas. Masters Thesis. University of Houston, Houston. 

Bruce KA, Cameron GN & Harcombe PA (1995) Initiation of a new woodland type on the Texas coastal prairie by the Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb.). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 215–225. 

Bruce KA, Cameron GN, Harcombe PA & Jubinsky G (1997) Introduction, impact on native habitats, and management of a woody invader, the Chinese tallow tree, Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb. Natural Areas Journal 25, 5–260. 

Camarillo SA, Stovall JP & Sunda CJ (2015) The impact of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) on stand dynamics in bottomland hardwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management 344, 10–19. 

Cameron GN & Spencer SR (1989) Rapid leaf decay and nutrient release in a Chinese tallow forest. Oecologia 80, 222–228. 

Cotton TB, Kwiatkowski MA, Saenz D & Collyer M (2012) Effects of an invasive plant, Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera), on development and survival of anuran larvae. Journal of Herpetology 46 (186–193), 201. 

DeWalt SJ, Siemann E & Rogers WE (2011) Geographic distribution of genetic variation among native and introduced populations of Chinese tallow tree, Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae). American Journal of Botany 98, 1128–1138. 

EPPO (2018) Pest risk analysis for Triadica sebifera EPPO, Paris. https://pra.eppo.int/. [accessed on 9 November 2018]. 

Gan J, Miller JH, Wang H & Taylor JW (2009) Invasion of tallow tree into southern US forests: influencing factors and implications for mitigation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39, 1346– 1356. 

Gao R, Su Z, Yin Y & Li S (2016) Germplasm, chemical constituents, biological activities, utilization, and control of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera (L.) Small). Biological Invasions 18, 809– 829. 

Grace JB (1998) Can prescribed fire save the endangered coastal prairie ecosystem from Chinese tallow invasion. Endangered Species Update 15, 70–76. 

Harcombe PA, Cameron GN & Glumac EG (1993) Above-ground net primary productivity in adjacent grassland and woodland on the coastal prairie of Texas, USA. Journal of Vegetation Science 4, 521–530. 

Hartley MK, DeWalt S, Rogers WE & Siemann E (2004) Characterization of arthropod assemblage supported by the Chinese Tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum) in southeast Texas. Texas Journal of Science 56, 369–382. 

Hartley MK, Rogers WE & Siemann E (2010) Comparisons of arthropod assemblages on an invasive and native trees: abundance, diversity and damage. Arthropod-Plant Interact 4, 237–245. 

Jaryan V, Uniyal SK, Kumar A, Gupta RC & Singh RD (2013) Extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum): using the red list criteria for documenting invasive species expanse. National Academy Science Letters 36, 85–91. 

Jones RH & McLeod KW (1989) Shade tolerance in seedlings of Chinese tallow tree, American sycamore, and cherrybark oak. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 116, 371–377. 

Jubinsky G & Anderson LC (1996) The invasive potential of Chinese tallow-tree (Sapium sebiferum Roxb.) in the Southeast. Castanea 61, 226–231. 

Kirmse RD & Fisher JT (1989) Species screening and biomass trials of woody plants in the semi-arid southwest United States. Biomass 18, 15–29. 

Langeland KA & Enloe SF (2009) Natural area weeds: Chinese tallow (Sapium sebiferum L.), [Online]. In: EDIS (Electronic Data Information Source). Publication #SS-AGR-45. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, IFAS (Institute of Food and Agricultural Science) Extension (Producer). Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ ag148 [accessed on 25 July 2017]. 

Leonard N (2008) The effects of the invasive exotic Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) on amphibians and aquatic invertebrates. University of New Orleans dissertation. 

Lieux MH (1975) Dominant pollen types recovered from commercial Louisiana honeys. Economic Botany 29, 87–96. 

Lin WC, Chen AC, Tseng CJ & Hwang SG (1958) An investigation and study of Chinese tallow tree in Taiwan (Sapium sebiferum, Roxb.). Bulletin of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute 57, 32–37. 

Meyer R (2011) Triadica sebifera. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed on 30 August 2017]

NSW Government, Australia (2017) NSW WeedWise: Chinese tallow tree (Triadica sebifera). Department of Primary Industries. Factsheet Available at: http://weeds.dpi.nsw.gov.au/Weeds/Details/38 [accessed on 23 May 2017]. 

Pattison RR & Mack RN (2008) Potential distribution of the invasive tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: evaluating CLIMEX predictions with field trials. Global Change Biology 14, 813–826. 

Radford AE, Ahles HE & Bell CR (1968) Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. pp. 667. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 

Renne IJ, Barrow WC, Randall J, Lori A & Bridges WC (2002) Generalized avian dispersal syndrome contributes to Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum, Euphorbiaceae) invasiveness. Diversity and Distributions 8, 285–295. 

Rogers WE & Siemann E (2005) Herbivory tolerance and compensatory differences in native and invasive ecotypes of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum). Plant Ecology 181, 57–68. 

Scheld HW & Cowles JR (1981) Woody biomass potential of the Chinese tallow tree. Economic Botany 35, 391–397. 

Siemann E & Rogers WE (2003) Herbivory, disease, recruitment limitation, and success of alien and native tree species. Ecology 84, 1489–1505. 

Tanner R, Branquart E, Brundu G, Buholzer S, Chapman D, Ehret P et al. (2017) The prioritisation of a short list of alien plants for risk analysis within the framework of the Regulation (EU) No. 1143/ 2014. NeoBiota 35, 87–118. 

USDA (2000) Plant guide: Chinese tallow tree–Triadica sebifera (L.) Small, [Online]. In: PLANTS Database–fact sheets & plant guides. Baton Rouge, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Data Center (Producer). Available at: http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_trse6.pdf [accessed on 25 October 2017]. 

Wen L, Wang Y, Lu D, Hu S & Han H (2010) Preparation of KF/CaO nanocatalyst and its application in biodiesel production from Chinese tallow seed oil. Fuel 89, 2267–2271. 

Zou J, Rogers WE, DeWalt SJ & Siemann E (2006) The effect of Chinese tallow tree (Sapium sebiferum) ecotype on soil-plant system carbon and nitrogen processes. Oecologia 150, 272–281.


This datasheet is an output of a DG Environment, LIFE funding, under the project LIFE15 PRE-FR 001: Mitigating the threat of invasive alien plants in the EU through pest risk analysis to support the EU Regulation 1143/2014. 

The datasheet was produced following an Expert Working Group (EWG) that risk analysed T. sebifera for the EPPO region in October 2017. The composition of the EWG was as follows: G. Brundu (University of Sassari, Department of Agriculture, IT), D. Chapman (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, GB), L. Flory (University of Florida, US), J. Le Roux (Stellenbosch University, ZA), O. Pescott (Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, GB), E. Siemann (Rice University, US), U. Starfinger (Institute for National and International Plant Health, DE) and R. Tanner (EPPO).

How to cite this datasheet?

EPPO (2023) Triadica sebifera. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. https://gd.eppo.int (accessed 2023-05-28)

Datasheet history 2019-10-08

This datasheet was first published in the EPPO Bulletin in 2019 and is now maintained in an electronic format in the EPPO Global Database. The sections on 'Identity' and 'Geographical distribution' are automatically updated from the database. For other sections, the date of last revision is indicated on the right.

EPPO (2019) Triadica sebifera (L.) Small. Datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. EPPO Bulletin 49(2), 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/epp.12350