Paraburkholderia caryophylli(PSDMCA)
Hosts
Important note about the classification of host plants in GD:
Categories have been assigned by the EPPO Secretariat on the basis of available data at the time of entry. They correspond to a qualitative evaluation of the importance of the host plant for the pest concerned and remain indicative only.
Further explanation of categories is available in the guide.
Categories have been assigned by the EPPO Secretariat on the basis of available data at the time of entry. They correspond to a qualitative evaluation of the importance of the host plant for the pest concerned and remain indicative only.
Further explanation of categories is available in the guide.
| Organism | Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Dianthus caryophyllus (DINCA) | Major host | |
* Onozaki T, Yamaguchi T, Himeno M, Ikeda H (1999) Evaluation of Wild Dianthus Accessions for Resistance to Bacterial Wilt (Pseudomonas caryophylli). Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 68(5), 974-978. | ||
| Eustoma russellianum (EVMGR) | Host | |
* Furuya N, Masunaga T, Khan A, Iiyama K, Matsumoto M, Matsuyama N (2000) Bacterial Wilt of Russell Prairie Gentian Caused by Burkholderia caryophylli. Journal of General Plant Pathology 66, 316-322. ------- as Eustoma grandiflorum * EFSA (2013) Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Burkholderia caryophylli for the EU territory with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 11(1), 3071. 91 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3071 ------- incidental host | ||
| Gypsophila paniculata (GYPPA) | Host | |
* Kishi K (1998) Plant disease in Japan. Tokyo: The Whole Farming Educational Association. pp. 1276. * Liu HL (1990) Bacterial wilt of Gypsophila paniculata caused by Pseudomonas caryophylli. Bulletin of Taichung District Agricultural Improvement Station 28, 33-42. * EFSA (2013) Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Burkholderia caryophylli for the EU territory with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 11(1), 3071. 91 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3071 ------- citing Liu (1990) and Kishi (1998) | ||
| Limonium sinuatum (LIISI) | Host | |
* Nishiyama J, Kobayashi T, Azegami K (1988) Bacterial wilt of statice caused by Pseudomonas caryophylli. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 54, 444-452. * EFSA (2013) Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Burkholderia caryophylli for the EU territory with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 11(1), 3071. 91 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3071 ------- incidental host | ||
| Dianthus allwoodii hybrids (DINAL) | Experimental | |
* Burkholder WH (1942) Three bacterial plant pathogens, Phytomonas caryophylli, sp. n., Phytomonas alliicola sp. n., and Phytomonas manihoti (Arthaud-Berthet et Bondar) Viegas. Phytopathology 32, 141-149. * EFSA (2013) Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Burkholderia caryophylli for the EU territory with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 11(1), 3071. 91 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3071 ------- citing Burkholder (1942), infected by artificial inoculation | ||
| Dianthus barbatus (DINBA) | Experimental | |
* Burkholder WH (1942) Three bacterial plant pathogens, Phytomonas caryophylli, sp. n., Phytomonas alliicola sp. n., and Phytomonas manihoti (Arthaud-Berthet et Bondar) Viegas. Phytopathology 32, 141-149. * EFSA (2013) Scientific Opinion on the risk to plant health posed by Burkholderia caryophylli for the EU territory with the identification and evaluation of risk reduction options. EFSA Journal 11(1), 3071. 91 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3071 ------- citing Burkholder (1942), infected by artificial inoculation | ||