Preferred name: Choristoneura rosaceana
Authority: (Harris)
Taxonomic position: Animalia: Arthropoda: Hexapoda: Insecta: Lepidoptera: Tortricidae
Other scientific names: Archips rosaceana Harris, Cacoecia rosaceana Harris, Loxotaenia rosaceana Harris, Teras vicariana Walker, Tortrix gossypiana Packard, Tortrix rosaceana Harris
Common names in English: oblique-banded leaf roller
view more common names online...
Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature EPPO Categorization: A1 list
EU Categorization: A1 Quarantine pest (Annex II A)
view more categorizations online...
EPPO Code: CHONRO

Choristoneura rosaceana is a polyphagous leaf-roller, recorded from over 80 plant species in 24 plant families (e.g., Schuh & Mote 1948; Prentice, 1966). Its preferred hosts are Rosaceae, and it has been considered a pest of apples (Malus domestica) (Chapman & Lienk, 1971) and to a lesser extent of pears (Pyrus communis) and peaches (Prunus persica). Historically, C. rosaceana was found primarily on wild apples and other native plants, and seldom encountered in orchards (Glass, 1975); however, it now infests a wide range of cultivated plants. It has been reported from raspberries (Rubus idaeus and R. strigosus) (e.g., Knowlton & Allen, 1937; Schuh & Mote, 1948, Li et al., 1999) and blueberries (Vaccinium), on ornamental shrubs, and on a wide variety of broadleaved trees (Acer, Betula, Platanus, Populus, Salix, Ulmus). It rarely causes significant damage to forest trees or berry crops. Foliar damage has also been reported on hazelnuts (Corylus avellana) (Gangavalli & AliNiazee, 1985a, b; AliNiazee, 1986; Walton et al., 2009) and pistachios (Pistacia vera) (Rice et al., 1988). In oviposition trials, Carriere et al. (1995) discovered that apple and snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus) hosts were preferred over wild rose (Rosa sp.).

Host list: Acer negundo, Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum, Acer sp., Aesculus californica, Alnus incana, Ambrosia sp., Amelanchier x spicata, Amorpha fruticosa, Aster sp., Betula alleghaniensis, Betula papyrifera, Betula populifolia, Betula sp., Calycanthus occidentalis, Ceanothus integerrimus, Celtis occidentalis, Cercis canadensis, Comandra umbellata, Cornus florida, Cornus racemosa, Cornus sp., Corylus avellana, Corylus sp., Crataegus sp., Dianthus caryophyllus, Fraxinus sp., Geranium sp., Helianthus annuus, Hypericum sp., Lonicera periclymenum, Lonicera sp., Malus domestica, Malus sp., Ostrya virginiana, Phaseolus vulgaris, Pistacia sp., Pistacia vera, Platanus orientalis, Populus balsamifera, Populus sp., Populus tremuloides, Prunus avium, Prunus ilicifolia, Prunus pensylvanica, Prunus persica, Prunus sp., Prunus virginiana, Pyrus communis, Pyrus sp., Quercus agrifolia, Quercus alba, Quercus macrocarpa, Quercus rubra, Quercus sp., Rhododendron sp., Rhus coriaria, Rosa sp., Rubus flagellaris, Rubus idaeus, Rubus sp., Salix lasiolepis, Salix sp., Solidago sp., Spiraea sp., Symphoricarpos rotundifolius, Syringa sp., Syringa vulgaris, Tilia americana, Tilia sp., Trifolium pratense, Typha latifolia, Ulmus americana, Ulmus sp., Vaccinium corymbosum, Vaccinium sp., Verbena sp., Viburnum lentago, Viburnum sp.

Choristoneura rosaceana is widely distributed across temperate North America, from Canada (e.g., Prentice 1966) to Northern Mexico (Brown, 2004; Bautista-Martínez et al., 2011), and from the Atlantic to the Pacific (e.g., Freeman, 1958; Powell 1964; Reissig, 2016). It is most commonly encountered at low altitudes, except in the more arid regions of the South-Western U.S. (Powell, 1964). It may be found in urban areas, gardens, greenhouses, orchards, parks, and forests.

North America: Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Québec, Saskatchewan), Mexico, United States of America (Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming)

In the northern half its range and at higher elevations (e.g., Nova Scotia to British Columbia, northern Utah, mountains of California), the obliquebanded leaf roller is univoltine (one generation per year). However, in the southern half of its range at lower elevations there are two generations per year, with adult capture records extending from 11 May through 3 October in Virginia (Lam et al., 2012). In univoltine populations, adults emerge in early summer. Eggs laid by those females, oviposited between 04:00 and 24:00 hr (with a peak around 20:00 hr), hatch in late summer, producing first instar larvae that crawl about in search of protected places, such as buds, under the calyx of fruit, or along the midrib of a leaf. After feeding for 3‒4 weeks, the larvae construct a hibernaculum, described as ‘loose cocoon’ by Venables (1924) and a ‘tightly woven silken chamber’ by Knowlton and Allen (1937), under bark, bud scales, or other protected sites, and enter an overwinter diapause. The larval stage for overwintering has been reported as the first, second or third instar (e.g., Chapman & Lienk, 1971). Larvae begin feeding again in late spring of the following year, and pupate in their leaf shelter in early summer, resulting in adults that emerge in mid- to late summer (June‒August).

In bivoltine populations, overwintering larvae begin feeding earlier in the spring, producing an earlier generation (adults in May to mid-June). Larvae of this brood continue to feed through late summer, rather than entering diapause, producing a second generation of adults (flying in August‒September). Eggs of this brood result in larvae that usually seek a hibernation site in October (Powell, 1964).

Gangavalli & AliNiazee (1985b) reported that an average of 111.9 degree-days (above 10°C) is required from oviposition to hatching, typically 7‒10 days; 435.6 degree-days for the development of six larval instars, 22‒46 days at 26.7°C.; and 117.4 degree-days (above 9.5°C) for pupal development, which is reported to last from 5‒8 in New Hampshire to as long as 7‒18 days in Nova Scotia (Powell, 1964). Females require 35.2 degree-days before oviposition.

At constant temperatures of 24, 20 and 16°C, larval diapause is induced by short photoperiods. A critical photoperiod of 14‒15 hr of light per day at 20°C and 16°C was documented by Gangavalli & AliNiazee (1985a).

For more information on the biology of C. rosaceana refer also to Furniss & Carolin (1977) and Reissig (1978).

Symptoms

Although C. rosaceana is primarily a leaf feeder, damage to buds and developing fruits (apples and peaches) (Simmons, 1973), or to fruit adjacent to leaves, can result in economic damage. On apples the most serious damage is caused by overwintering larvae which can be found inside bud clusters feeding on various floral parts. Larvae continue to feed on the flowers during bloom and developing fruit after petal fall. Afterwards they feed on both fruit and new foliage. Most damaged fruits drop before harvest, and those remaining on the tree may show corky scars and deep indentations. Newly hatched larvae of the second generation also damage fruits and may induce serious injury to the fruit skin.

On peaches, larvae not only feed on the foliage but also on the surface of the fruits, especially on peaches with open split pits, where they feed around the opened stem end and into the fleshy areas around the pit.

Although larvae are similar to those other leaf-rolling tortricids, in apples, C. rosaceana is by far the most frequently encountered leaf-roller (Chapman & Lienk, 1971).

Morphology

Eggs

Egg masses are usually deposited on the upper surface of leaves and may contain 250 or more eggs in an overlapping pattern. The masses are generally irregularly rounded in shape, with average dimension of 5.3 x 9.2 mm (Chapman & Lienk, 1971), and covered with a translucent green colleterial secretion. 

Larva

Last instar larvae, which are similar in color to those of the preceding instars, are green to yellowish green, 25‒30 mm long, and the head is black to light brown. The prothoracic shield varies from uniformly dark (black to brown) to lacking shading altogether (concolourous with body); and the thoracic legs are dark brown to black (Chapman & Lienk, 1971; Gilligan & Epstein, 2014). The larvae are somewhat variable and similar to many other tortricids. As in most tortricids, the last abdominal segment bears a distinctive anal comb (= anal fork) below the shield.

Pupa

The pupa is initially pale greenish brown, becoming dark reddish brown as the adult develops. It is 10‒11 mm in length, and has two rows of tiny spines across the dorsum of most abdominal segments. It also has a pronounced cremaster with four pairs of tiny hook-tipped setae at the end of the abdomen.

Adult

Forewing length is 7.5‒11.0 mm in males, 11.5‒14.0 mm in females. The forewing pattern is variable, but the majority of individuals have three, variably expressed, oblique facia extending from the costa to the hind margin. The costal margin is slightly sinuate, giving the resting adult a bell-shaped silhouette, more pronounced in females than in males. Males have a characteristic, feather-like, forewing costal fold. Colour images of adults and genitalia are available in Gilligan & Epstein (2014).

Adults are similar to other species of Choristoneura, especially C. fractivittana and C. parallela, although these species are considerably less common, and their males lack a costal fold (Gilligan & Epstein, 2014). Many species of Pandemis have a similar forewing pattern, but males of these species are easily distinguished from those of obliquebanded leafroller by the absence of a costal fold and the presence of a notch at the base of the antenna.

Detection and inspection methods

Rolled leaves are the most obvious signs of the presence of leaf roller larvae as the larvae feed in webbed terminals, buds, and rolled leaves.

Monitoring techniques for obliquebanded leafroller vary depending on the number of generations (i.e., one vs. two) in specific regions. To survey for overwintering larvae, which are present during the period between bloom and petal fall, five terminal shoots and five fruit buds in 10 trees (50 terminals and 50 fruit buds in total) should be checked for signs of caterpillar feeding activity or overwintering shelters.The presence and density of adults can be monitored with pheromone traps (Delisle, 1992), but Thomson et al. (1991) provide evidence of regional differences in response to pheromone blends. Trap data can be used to establish biofix (i.e., the beginning of day-degree calculations) and to estimate population density.

Local spread of C. rosaceana is ensured by moth flight, and by larval ‘ballooning’ on a fine line of silk (Chapman et al., 1968). In international trade, C. rosaceana may be moved via the transport of infested plants and/or foliage of its hosts. Since the larvae feed externally on the fruits, it is unlikely that they would be transported via commercially traded fruits.

Economic impact

Choristoneura rosaceana can be an economically important pest in orchards, especially on apples, but it is not considered a problem in forests or gardens. Larval feeding in buds may reduce yield, and feeding on the surface of developing fruit results in cosmetic damage that reduces fruit quality and marketability.

Control

Obliquebanded leafroller may be controlled with insecticides that are effective against other similar sized larvae applied at petal fall. If necessary, another spray may be applied in the summer when most of the summer brood eggs have hatched. An alternative strategy is to control overwintering larvae at petal fall and apply sprays during June to kill the first summer brood adults and newly hatching larvae. Conventional organophosphate insecticides can be used in this type of program. When adult activities are monitored using pheromone traps, the first spray should be applied about 7 days after the first male moth is captured. Subsequent sprays should be applied at 14-day intervals as long as the flight period continues. In Ontario, Canada, obliquebanded leafroller has developed resistance to organophosphate insecticides in most commercial orchards. Dunley et al. (2006) discuss pesticide resistance in apple orchards in Washington. Cross resistance to pyrethroids and certain insect growth regulators also has been documented in some obliquebanded leafroller populations (Carriere et al., 1996). 

Dormant oil spray followed by bloom sprays ofBacillus thuringiensisor sprays of spinosad (e.g., Entrust) can be used to control obliquebanded leafrollers on organically certified crops. Delayed dormant treatments and bloom time applications for other pests usually keep leafroller populations under control.

The use of sex pheromones for mating disruption may be an effective tool as part of an integrated pest management plan (Knight et al., 1998; Trimble & Appleby, 2004). Although several parasitoids (e.g., Macrocentrus iridescens and Glypta variegata) are known to attack obliquebanded leafroller, none adequately controls the pest. Macrocentrus iridescens has been observed attacking obliquebanded leafroller larvae in apple orchards of the Central Valley, Central Coast, and North Coast areas of California. Itoplectis conquisitor and Meteorus trachynotus also may play a role in integrated pest management programmes. The use of Bacillus thuringiensis can be highly compatible with parasitoids (Cossentine et al., 2013). For more information see also Hagley & Barber (1991) and Delisle (1992).

Phytosanitary risk

Although C. rosaceana was added to the EPPO A1 list, it is not regarded as a quarantine pest by any other regional plant protection organization. Owing to its extremely broad host range and its wide distribution in the temperate regions of North America, C. rosaceana presents a risk for the EPPO region, especially for fruit trees, apples in particular.

Measures recommended against other quarantine leafrollers, including Choristoneura conflictana, Archips argyrospila, and Epiphyas postvittana, should be effective against C. rosaceana, including the inspection of potential host plant material at ports of entry.

AliNiazee MT (1986) Seasonal history, adult flight activity, and damage of the obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in filbert orchards. Canadian Entomologist 118, 351–359.

Bautista-Martínez N, Chavarín-Palacio C & López-Bautista E (2011) Primer reporte del enrollador de bandas oblicuas, Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), en manzano en el Ejido Vista Hermosa, Ciudad Cuauhtémoc, Chihuahua, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.) 27(3), 819–824.

Brown JW (2004) Preliminary assessment of Lepidoptera diversity on the peninsula of Baja California, Mexico, with a list of documented species. Folia Entomologia Mexicana 43, 87–114.

Carriere Y, Deland JP & Roff DA (1996) Obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) resistant to insecticides: among-orchard variation and cross resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 89, 577–582.

Carriere T, Pare S & Roitberg BD (1995) Oviposition preference of a polyphagous moth, the oblique banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomologist 127, 577–586.

Chapman PJ & Lienk SE (1971) Tortricid fauna of apple in New York (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae); including an account of apple's occurrence in the state, especially as a naturalized plant. Special Publication Geneva, NY, New York Agricultural Experiment Station, 122 pp.

Chapman, PJ, Lienk SE & Dean RW (1968) Bionomics of Choristoneura rosaceana. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61, 285–290.

Cossentine JE, Jensen LB & Deglow EK (2003) Strategy for orchard use of Bacillus thuringiensis while minimizing impacts on Choristoneura rosaceana parasitoids. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 109, 205–210.

Delisle J (1992) Monitoring season male flight activity of Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in eastern Canada using virgin females and several different pheromone blends. Environmental Entomology 21, 1007–1012.

Dunley JE, Brunner JF, Doerr MD & Beers EH (2006) Resistance and cross-resistance in populations of the leafrollers, Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis pyrusana, in Washington apples. Journal of Insect Science 6, 6–14.

Freeman TN (1958) The Archipinae fauna of North America (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Canadian Entomologist 90, Supplement 7, 1–89.

Furniss RL & Carolin VM (1977) Western forest insects, pp. 168-173. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1339. Forest Service, USDA, Washington, USA.

Gangavalli RR & AliNiazee MT (1985a) Diapause induction in the oblique-banded leafroller Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): role of photoperiod and temperature. Journal of Insect Physiology 31, 831–835.

Gangavalli RR & AliNiazee MT (1985b) Temperature requirements for development of the obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environmental Entomology 14, 17–19.

Gilligan TM & Epstein ME (2014) TORTAI (Tortricids of Agricultural Importance). http://idtools.org/id/leps/tortai/

Glass EH (1975) Recent development in deciduous orchard pest management in the United States. EPPO Bulletin 5, 101-111.

Hagley EAC & Barber DR (1991) Foliage feeding Lepidoptera and their parasites recovered from unmanaged apple orchards in southern Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 122, 1–7.

Knight AL, Thomson DR & Cockfield SD (1998) Developing mating disruption of obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Washington State. Environmental Entomology 2, 1080–1088.

Knowlton GF & Allen MW (1937) Oblique-banded leaf roller, a dewberry pest in Utah. Journal of Economic Entomology 30, 780–785.

Lam W, Rota J & Brown JW (2012) A preliminary list of the leaf-roller moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) of Virginia. Banisteria 37(2011), 3–37.

Li S-Y, Fitzpatrick SM, Troubridge JT, Sharkey MJ, Barron JR & O’Hara, JE (1999) Parasitoids reared from obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) infesting raspberries. Canadian Entomologist 131, 399–404.

Powell JA (1964) Biological and taxonomic studies on tortricine moths, with reference to the species in California. University of California Publications in Entomology 32, 317 pp.

Prentice RM (1966) Vol. 4. Microlepidoptera. In: Forest Lepidoptera of Canada recorded by the Forest Insect Survey. Department of Forestry Canada, Publication 1142 (1965), 543–840.

Reissig WH (2016) Obliquebanded leafroller. New York State Integrated Pest Management Program. Web page: http://nysipm.cornell.edu/factsheets/treefruit/pests/oblr/oblr.asp

Rice RE, Flaherty DL & Jones RA (1988) The obliquebanded leafroller: a new pest in pistachios? California Agriculture 42, 27-29.

Schuh J & Mote DC (1948) The oblique-banded leaf roller on red raspberries. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 13, 43 pp.

Simmons GA (1973) The obliquebanded leafroller and Cenopis pettitana infesting maple buds in Michigan. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 66, 1166–1167.

Thomson DR, Angerilli NPD, Vincent C & Gaunce AP (1991) Evidence for regional differences in the response of obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to sex pheromone blends. Environmental Entomology 20, 935–938.

Trimble RM & Appleby ME (2004) Comparison of efficacy of programs using insecticide and insecticide plus mating disruption for controlling the obliquebanded leafroller in apple (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 518–524.

Venables EP (1924) Leaf-rollers attacking orchard trees in the Okanangan Valley. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 21(1923), 22-26.

Walton VM, Chambers U & Olsen JL (2009) The current status of the newly invasive hazelnut aphid in Oregon hazelnut orchards. Acta Horticulturae 845, 479–486.

This datasheet was extensively revised in 2022 by John W. Brown, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC. His valuable contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

EPPO (2024) Choristoneura rosaceana. EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation. https://gd.eppo.int (accessed 2024-11-21)

This datasheet was first published in 1997 in the second edition of 'Quarantine Pests for Europe' and revised in 2022. It is now maintained in an electronic format in the EPPO Global Database. The sections on 'Identity', ‘Hosts’, and 'Geographical distribution' are automatically updated from the database. For other sections, the date of last revision is indicated on the right.

CABI/EPPO (1997) Quarantine Pests for Europe (2^nd edition). CABI, Wallingford (GB).