Grablovirus vitis(GRBAV0)
Hosts
Important note about the classification of host plants in GD:
Categories have been assigned by the EPPO Secretariat on the basis of available data at the time of entry. They correspond to a qualitative evaluation of the importance of the host plant for the pest concerned and remain indicative only.
Further explanation of categories is available in the guide.
Categories have been assigned by the EPPO Secretariat on the basis of available data at the time of entry. They correspond to a qualitative evaluation of the importance of the host plant for the pest concerned and remain indicative only.
Further explanation of categories is available in the guide.
Organism | Type | |
---|---|---|
Vitis vinifera (VITVI) | Major host | |
* Martelli GP (2017) An overview of grapevine viruses, viroids and the diseases they cause. In: Meng B, Martelli GP, Golino DA, Fuchs M (eds), Grapevine Viruses: Molecular Biology, Diagnostics and Management, Springer pp.31-46. * Bahder BW, Zalom FG, Sudarshana MR (2016) An evaluation of the flora adjacent to wine grape vineyards for the presence of alternative host plants of rapevine red blotch-associated virus. Plant Disease 100, 1571-1574. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0153-RE * Perry KL, McLane H, Hyder MZ, Dangl GS, Thompson JR, Fuchs MF (2016) Grapevine red blotch-associated virus is present in free-living Vitis spp. proximal to cultivated grapevines. Phytopathology 106, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0035-R | ||
Vitis californica (VITCL) | Wild/Weed | |
* Wilson H, Hogg BN, Blaisdell GK, Andersen JC, Yazdani AS, Billings AC, Ooi KL, Soltani N, Almeida RP, Cooper ML, Al Rwahnih M (2022) Survey of vineyard insects and plants to identify potential insect vectors and noncrop reservoirs of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus. PhytoFrontiers 2(1), 66-73. | ||
Vitis hybrids (VITHD) | Wild/Weed | |
* Bahder BW, Zalom FG, Sudarshana MR (2016) An evaluation of the flora adjacent to wine grape vineyards for the presence of alternative host plants of rapevine red blotch-associated virus. Plant Disease 100, 1571-1574. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-16-0153-RE ------- Free living vines of Vitis californica × V. vinifera. * Cieniewicz E, Thompson JR, McLane H, Perry KL, Dangl GS, Corbett Q, Martinson T, Wise A, Wallis A, O'Connell J, Dunst R, Cox K, Fuchs M (2017) Prevalence and genetic diversity of grabloviruses in free-living Vitis spp. Plant Disease 102, 2308-2316. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-18-0496-RE * Perry KL, McLane H, Hyder MZ, Dangl GS, Thompson JR, Fuchs MF (2016) Grapevine red blotch-associated virus is present in free-living Vitis spp. proximal to cultivated grapevines. Phytopathology 106, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0035-R ------- GRBaV was confirmed infecting 4 free-living vines, 2 of which were shown to be V. californica × V. vinifera hybrids. | ||
Vitis riparia (VITRI) | Wild/Weed | |
* DeShields JB, Levin AD, Hilton R, Rijal J (2022) Epidemiology of Grapevine Red Blotch Disease progression in Southern Oregon vineyards. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 73(2), 116-124. | ||
Vitis sp. (VITSS) | Wild/Weed | |
* Cieniewicz E, Thompson JR, McLane H, Perry KL, Dangl GS, Corbett Q, Martinson T, Wise A, Wallis A, O'Connell J, Dunst R, Cox K, Fuchs M (2017) Prevalence and genetic diversity of grabloviruses in free-living Vitis spp. Plant Disease 102, 2308-2316. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-18-0496-RE * Perry KL, McLane H, Hyder MZ, Dangl GS, Thompson JR, Fuchs MF (2016) Grapevine red blotch-associated virus is present in free-living Vitis spp. proximal to cultivated grapevines. Phytopathology 106, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-16-0035-R ------- Free living vines. | ||
Rubus hedycarpus subsp. armeniacus (RUBAE) | Doubtful host | |
* DeShields JB, Levin AD, Hilton R, Rijal J (2022) Epidemiology of Grapevine Red Blotch Disease progression in Southern Oregon vineyards. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 73(2), 116-124. ------- As Rubus armeniacus. "blackberry is unlikely to be an alternative host with epidemiological significance". |