EPPO Global Database

Cotoneaster x watereri(CTTWT)

Pests

Organism Type
Chrysobothris femorata (as Cotoneaster) (CHRBFE) Doubtful host
* Beddes T & Caron M (2014) Pacific Flatheaded Borer and Flatheaded Appletree Borer. Utah Pests Fact Sheet, (ENT-170-14PR)
------- no details given on the live stage associated. 

* Paiero SM, Jackson MD, Jewiss-Gaines A, Kimoto T, Gill BD, Marshall SA (2012) Field guide to the jewel beetles of northeastern North America. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 
------- covers several species of the femorata complex together

* EPPO (2021) EPPO Technical Document No. 1083. Pest risk analysis for Chrysobothris femorata and C. mali. EPPO, Paris. Available at https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/CHRBFE/documents
------- very uncertain host (life stages are not indicated or record may relate to other species in the femorata complex) 

Epiphyas postvittana (as Cotoneaster) (TORTPO) Host
Erwinia amylovora (ERWIAM) Host
* Zeller W (1977) Studies on fire blight in the German Federal Republic. 2. Susceptibility of woody ornamentals to Erwinia amylovora. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 29(1 ), p 1-10.
Erwinia amylovora (as Cotoneaster) (ERWIAM) Host
* Giorgi S, Scortichini M (2005) Molecular characterization of Erwinia amylovora strains from different host plants through RFLP analysis and sequencing of hrpN and dspA/E genes. Plant Pathology 54, 789-798.

* Lecomte P, Cadic C, Belin J, Saubion M (1992) Sensitivity of Cotoneaster to fireblight.  PHM Revue Horticole 324, 26-29.

* Zeller W (1977) Studies on fire blight in the German Federal Republic. 2. Susceptibility of woody ornamentals to Erwinia amylovora. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 29(1 ), p 1-10.
Grapholita molesta (as Cotoneaster) (LASPMO) Host
Anoplophora chinensis (as Cotoneaster) (ANOLCN) Major host
* Sjöman H, Östberg J & Nilsson J (2014) Review of host trees for the wood-boring pests Anoplophora glabripennis and Anoplophora chinensis: an urban forest perspective. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40(3), 143–164.