Cotoneaster pannosus(CTTPA)
Pests
| Organism | Type | |
|---|---|---|
| Chrysobothris femorata (as Cotoneaster) (CHRBFE) | Doubtful host | |
* Beddes T & Caron M (2014) Pacific Flatheaded Borer and Flatheaded Appletree Borer. Utah Pests Fact Sheet, (ENT-170-14PR) ------- no details given on the live stage associated. * Paiero SM, Jackson MD, Jewiss-Gaines A, Kimoto T, Gill BD, Marshall SA (2012) Field guide to the jewel beetles of northeastern North America. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. ------- covers several species of the femorata complex together * EPPO (2021) EPPO Technical Document No. 1083. Pest risk analysis for Chrysobothris femorata and C. mali. EPPO, Paris. Available at https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/CHRBFE/documents ------- very uncertain host (life stages are not indicated or record may relate to other species in the femorata complex) | ||
| Epiphyas postvittana (as Cotoneaster) (TORTPO) | Host | |
| Erwinia amylovora (as Cotoneaster) (ERWIAM) | Host | |
* Giorgi S, Scortichini M (2005) Molecular characterization of Erwinia amylovora strains from different host plants through RFLP analysis and sequencing of hrpN and dspA/E genes. Plant Pathology 54, 789-798. * Lecomte P, Cadic C, Belin J, Saubion M (1992) Sensitivity of Cotoneaster to fireblight. PHM Revue Horticole 324, 26-29. * Zeller W (1977) Studies on fire blight in the German Federal Republic. 2. Susceptibility of woody ornamentals to Erwinia amylovora. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 29(1 ), p 1-10. | ||
| Grapholita molesta (as Cotoneaster) (LASPMO) | Host | |
| Phytophthora ramorum (PHYTRA) | Host | |
* Pastalka T, Abeysekara N, Schweigkofler W (2024) First report of Phytophthora ramorum on Cotoneaster sp. in the USA. Plant Disease 108(1), 231. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-23-1330-PDN | ||
| Anoplophora chinensis (as Cotoneaster) (ANOLCN) | Major host | |
* Sjöman H, Östberg J & Nilsson J (2014) Review of host trees for the wood-boring pests Anoplophora glabripennis and Anoplophora chinensis: an urban forest perspective. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40(3), 143–164. | ||